Over the last two years, Montoya has pushed the presidency of David Lowrie ad nauseum. I like David Lowrie, as I have mentioned in the past. Aint got a bone to pick with him. If he wants to run for a second term as president, more power to him.
My problem is with how Montoya raves over David Lowrie and almost implies that to not vote for Lowrie is tantamount to treason. He pushed and pushed Lowrie and now that supposedly Currie has a candidate that he likes, Montoya throws a fit.
Let me go on record to say, I haven’t a clue who Mitch is. Never heard the name until Montoya brought it up. I don’t know enough about him to even consider voting for him. I don’t bow down to Currie or Montoya when it comes to voting my conscience. At this point I would probably vote for Lowrie, if he runs again. Because I know him and have seen the good work he has done.
Why is it ok for Montoya to drum up support for candidate Lowrie, as he has in the past and will probably do in the future and not ok for Currie to do the same? Does not Currie have the right to support and push any candidate he wants?
Oh, I know the argument is that TBC has in the past endorsed candidates and that this may smack of that. But so has Montoya/Davis. They claim a “large” audience from respective blogs and use it to push candidates and issues. I don’t have to answer to either groups when I vote. And neither does the rest of the convention.
So what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.